Hello, I hope your day is going well! In today’s blog post, I will be exploring Wiggenstein’s philosophy as well as its relationship with pedagogy, or the art and science of education. Firstly, we will take a look at Michael Peter’s work, titled Wiggenstein’s Styles of Thinking. Next, we will take a look at some of the connexions between this philosophical paper and the work that Dasein the Philosopher did while on his philosophy trip to Europe. Finally, we will finish by presenting some possible roads towards an answer to the following question: How can teaching techniques be used as a writing style? Let’s get started!
In Michael Peter’s work titled Wiggenstein’s Styles of Thinking, he states that Wiggenstein is ‘’not a philosopher who provides a method for analyzing educational concepts but rather as one who approaches philosophical questions from a pedagogical point of view.’’ It seems to me that what Peters is essentially introducing here is the idea that Wiggenstein’s style is that he is using an Educator’s lens to examine philosophical questions, and NOT using a philosopher’s point of view to analyze the Art and Science of Teaching. Peters also mentions that ‘’the aim of the great educator is to teach us to think for ourselves’’. I believe that this is true since, in my humble opinion, I believe that one of education’s goals is to create citizens that are able to critically think, and one is not critically thinking if they are simply copying another person’s way of thinking. Finally, in this work, Peters also begins describing Wiggenstein’s many writing styles as if it were a long list of teaching techniques, such as pictures, drawings, analogies, similes, jokes, equations, questions, and even wrong answers.
While examining Wiggenstein’s Styles of Thinking , I was reminded of my own philosophy trip to Europe where I began questioning my own teaching style. In one of my next books, titled Dasein’s Philosophical Thought: Post Europe, the young philosopher (Dasein) writes about his visit to Europe and how this trip became a catalyst to his Aesthetic questioning. I will have to admit that before reading Peter’s work on Wiggenstein, I never thought about teaching techniques as inspiration for different writing styles. However, while reading Peters paper, (which can be found by googling➡️Wittgenstein’s style of thinking), I used one of my favorite teaching techniques, which is drawing schematic notes so that I can better teach myself the content found in what I was reading. I have included these schematic notes further below in this post. This reflection has helped me become aware of how I use schematic notes before writing my own blog posts and/or books. This further makes me wonder how I can use other teaching techniques and transform them into different writing styles?
How can I use teaching techniques as writing styles? How and why? What is a style? These are a few more questions that I am left with since reading Wiggenstein’s Styles of Thinking. I believe that before I can begin using teaching techniques as writing styles, I will first have to sit down and reflect on what teaching techniques I find myself using most often in my own classroom. Once this list has been created, I think that a good starting point will be to reflect on the nature of each teaching technique and in what context can each be useful in clarifying knowledge for myself and others. For example, if I am teaching sciences and I find myself drawing pictures for my students to better understand their own biological systems, what is the point of drawing the organs instead of just creating a list and how can think technique be used as a writing style. This one seems a little straight forward since I could either include pictures and diagrams in my own philosophical writing or I can also attempt to ‘’paint a picture’’ in my readers mind so that they can draw out the pictures and diagrams that I will be using to explain a certain concept on their own. I can already see that I will be reflecting on this connection between teaching techniques and writing styles for a while…
In conclusion, I found that Wiggenstein’s Styles of Thinking was a great pedagogical read as it not only helped me reflect on my own practice, but it also gave me some questions to follow while I work on my next philosophy book. Also, this idea that teaching techniques can be used as writing styles is fascinating to me since there is now another link between the necessity of philosophy in pedagogy that has been revealed to me. Finally, I intend to continue reflecting on the following questions, in the hopes of clarifying my own philosophical thought: How can I use teaching techniques as writing styles? How and why? What is a style?
I hope your guys got some value out of this post!
See you again next week for more philosophy and pedagogy content!
Follow me on instagram @patrickjhilario for more philosophy photos like the one above! ( I also drew that picture of Wiggenstein haha)
Have a great day!
-PJH
PS: I will be starting a new semester and will be teaching more classes than the previous semester, meaning that I will most likely be slightly busier than usual. Hopefully, I can still keep up to date with this blog 😊
